Embark on a thought-provoking journey as we dissect the complex theories of light and gravity, first proposed by Nikola Tesla and later reevaluated by contemporary scientists. Discover the compelling arguments against classical notions of relativity and learn about Dr. Simhoni’s model, which promises to redefine our understanding of the cosmos. Filled with expert commentary and historical insights, this episode challenges you to look at physics from a new perspective.
Welcome to Real Science Radio. Fred Williams here with Doug McBurney, joined once again by Dr. Pete Moore. Today we wrap up our series on Einstein’s theory of relativity. Over the past few shows, we’ve exposed its many flaws and introduced a powerful alternative. In this final episode, we’ll tie it all together and show why the future of physics may lie beyond Einstein.
SPEAKER 05 :
Scholars can’t explain it all away.
SPEAKER 1 :
Get ready to be awed by the handiwork of God. Tune in to Real Science Radio.
SPEAKER 05 :
Turn up the Real Science Radio. Keeping it real.
SPEAKER 03 :
Nikola Tesla said this, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether. This guy’s highly respected for all the patents that he’s done. Absolutely. The alternating electric motor. He’s a genius. And this is what he had to say about light. It is a sound wave in the ether. And then he goes on to say, in an article that was picked up by the New York Times back in 1934. That article says, We have made sure by experiment, said Mr. Tesla, that light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of the character of the source, Such constancy of velocity can only be explained by assuming that it is dependent solely on the physical properties of the medium, especially density and elastic force. Now notice, he puts it solely on the physical properties of the medium, not on the speed of the observer that was watching it.
SPEAKER 02 :
Right, right. And we have to keep in mind that while Nikola Tesla did have some fantastical ideas, he did come up with radio and alternating current, real things that really work to this day. Absolutely.
SPEAKER 04 :
And look what he says in this quote here that you’re sharing with us, Dr. Moore. We have made sure by experiment. So I want to say something else that Nikola Tesla said. Quote, today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
SPEAKER 03 :
That sounds like the Sir Isaac Newton warning. It sure does. Right? Different words.
SPEAKER 04 :
You’ve got to go back to our last show to find out what the Isaac Newton warning was. But, man, doesn’t this sound a lot like the special theory of relativity wandering off after equation after equation? So, good stuff.
SPEAKER 03 :
Now, let’s go look at what he said. I’m going to circle a word here. See the word density? What is density? Density… is mass per unit volume. So this ether that he’s talking about here must have mass per unit volume. And guess what? Look at the word mass. What is mass? Look in our universe today. Show me something that’s mass. It’s always a particle. Excuse me. We’ve got back to Simhoni’s particles, haven’t we? By another method, by another man, it’s implying particles. This is a YouTube video screenshot of a group that studies wave theory, energy wave theory. And they have some excellent, excellent things. And this was one screenshot I took. And in it, they say the equations of energy wave theory require a density constant to accurately calculate particle energy and force. Without it, the calculations are not even possible. Look what they say there. I’m going to blow it up for you. Boop. Density properly implies waves traveling in a medium with given mass per unit volume. We got back to the same thing that Tesla said. What is mass? In our universe, anything you can show me that we can weigh is a particle. Period. Period. So these people are strongly implying that whatever this ether is, the equation itself is pointing you toward mass and particles in a unit volume, and you saw the beautiful unit cube that Simhoni has for it. If you want to look at more of their stuff, I’m not trying to steal their stuff. I’ll advertise it. Here’s their YouTube link. You can go there, and they have many very good things on energy wave theory, but this is one of them. Now, we’ve got to go back and find out. We couldn’t use the entrained ether. We couldn’t use a rotating ether because of the problems. I’m going to now suggest the solution to that. There’s another one. So we’ve got the same Earth. We’re going to send it off on its course. But before we do, remember that the blue in this picture is the ether. And Simhoni is showing the ether can be contaminated by a nuclear particle. What’s a nuclear particle? Well, every atom on planet Earth, whether it’s sodium or chloride, has a nucleus. Those nucleus are real tiny and they actually can go inside this epola cube. There’s always eight to a cube and the nuclear particle can get in. But when it goes in, notice what’s happening if you get bigger and bigger mass particle. You see it beginning to distort the epaula. The epaula is distorting and getting a higher volume once that particle gets inside it. Here is the epaula 2D with one of the particles in the middle. Notice the distortion. Remember, well, let’s cover this first. Mass is an inclusion in the ether. It is taking pure ether and then you stick something in it, that becomes an inclusion or a contaminant, but it also distorts the ether and lowers its density in that little region. So we’re gonna send our planet, our Earth around the sun. Before we do, I wanna go back to Albert Einstein. Now, we’ve given him a few black eyes so far, but I don’t want to underestimate what he really has done. And one of the things you have to give him credit, he finally said there is an ether. He does allow a distortion, which is a movement of that ether, and you can see the movement above, creates the gravitational field. He said distortion of the ether then, or the distortion of space, is what creates gravity. And I believe he’s absolutely correct. And it even is in accordance with Simhoni’s ePola model of space.
SPEAKER 04 :
So you’re saying it’s not time dilation.
SPEAKER 03 :
Right. I’m going to let the Earth create a gravitational field in the ether. Now watch the rotating Earth. It’ll kind of turn a bubble of blue. That bubble of blue is the distorted ether. So it is creating in the volume of the mass of the earth a part of the ether that is totally different than it was. The earth mass distorted the ether. And that distortion stays with the earth. When the earth goes, it’s not dragging the ether. It’s dragging the distorted shape of ether.
SPEAKER 04 :
And that’s going to get you the null result.
SPEAKER 03 :
And that is exactly right. You’re thinking beyond me and that’s exactly right. This particular distorted ether is different than the ether all around it. It travels with the earth and therefore the earth is standing still with regard to its own gravitational ether field.
SPEAKER 04 :
Yep.
SPEAKER 03 :
Does that all make sense?
SPEAKER 02 :
Number one, if that’s not weird enough for you, you’re just too weird, okay? That’s weird enough for me. But does this explain why it appears gravity propagates instantaneously?
SPEAKER 03 :
Gravity does not go instantaneously. Gravity is thought, even by secular scientists, to travel at the speed of light. And it actually should travel at the speed of light because the same ether controls the speed of light. And so it also is going to control the reactions of gravity.
SPEAKER 02 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 03 :
So now we go to the professor from Colorado University, Mr. Beckman, on page 28. He said he disagrees with the entangled or entrained ether, where you jerk it out and drag it around or rotate it, clear out to who knows where at thousands of times the speed of light or millions of times. He said it’s not entrained ether, but it’s local gravitational field ether. He and Einstein are almost laying on top of each other here. Yes. But in doing so, Einstein never told you what the ether was, and he’s waiting for you to figure out one that could follow the Earth. So he didn’t know about this. This is the solution that actually knocks his theory right out of the ballpark. Exactly.
SPEAKER 04 :
And this Peter Beckman from CU, he was a critic of special relativity, but he wanted there to be another competing model.
SPEAKER 03 :
And unfortunately, he died before Simhoni had put forth this model. He would have been elated to know that the model of Simhoni gives the gravitational field he talked about because he knew if you could go with the gravitational field, Ether, it solves the Michelson-Morley equation. Yep. solves the MMX mystery. Now, this distorted ether is going the exact same speed of the Earth, and now when you do the light experiment, you will get the right answer. Now, to show you how a nuclear particle goes through the ether, it does so frictionless. It’s like if you look at a frictionless bearing, what’s the best frictionless bearing we have? Take two magnets, North Pole, North Pole, hold them together, rub them together. They slide apart. They don’t want to touch, and they don’t generate heat. They actually push apart, and that is frictionless. So this nuclear green particle is now going to go through the ether – the simoni ether now get this as it goes in it takes energy to force that electron and positron apart they are strongly adhering to one another but as it passes it they come back together on the back side and give it back the energy it took so once it’s moving it will move forever
SPEAKER 02 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 03 :
And so this seems to be getting at the wave-particle duality and how we think we’re seeing a photon pop out of… Yeah, the wave-particle duality is when that little green particle goes through, it’s actually opening… Before it gets to the particle, the particle’s already opening up and setting up a wave motion in front of that green particle.
SPEAKER 04 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 03 :
So your wave duality is that it sets up a wave in the ether. Before it quite gets there, it opens it up so that it can get through. And once it gets through, it imparts the energy back so it can go the next inch.
SPEAKER 02 :
Right. So photons aren’t photons aren’t popping out of nowhere. That’s correct. Now look at this.
SPEAKER 03 :
We have here a 2D model of the ether. And let’s take a helium nuclei and bring it in. An alpha particle. See how that spread them apart? The ether distorted. When you have mass distorting the ether, like Einstein said, it creates gravity. And I’ll show you that a little bit later. This produces gravity, as we shall see. I will get to that. If you look at a cube, now it’s kind of a 3D. Think of each of those corners an electron or a positron all the way around. And now let’s look at a 2D slice of the ether or the epaula. And I’m going to create a inclusion in one of those right there. Now with one piece of mass, The particles on the left and the right, they’re trying to pull together, but through that dotted line, they’re actually touching one another, like with a magnetic push-off.
SPEAKER 02 :
Mm-hmm.
SPEAKER 03 :
On the right and the left side, what’s the vertical distance between those? Are they the same? No. So to the right and the left of that big black thing, the vertical distance is a certain thing. And on the left side, it’s about the same. You make a perfect square. See that perfect square around it? So in this case, there’s no net force that’s bigger on one side than the other in the horizontal direction. But watch what happens if I put a second particle. What happens? Now look at what happened on one side of each of those black dots. It’s tall or further apart, meaning weaker. And on the right side of that right one, it’s smaller. Now you have a net different column force. Now you have a differential. And where they’re closer together is stronger. It’s going to push that particle on the right to the left. And the left particle, if you go to its left, that’s closer together than the one in the middle. So both of these is going to create a push force driving them together. It’s the differential electric force based on those trapezoid shapes that is now encompassing each of the particles. You don’t have it if you have one particle, but you do when you have two particles. This is tension forces. Right. Some people say, well, those dotted lines and the frictionless, are you sure that’s science? Well, look what, this is exactly what… Maxwell wrote, he has a magnetic field circle and electric field particles that he thought were like ball bearings. All I have done is taken the electric one and put it in the middle of the big one because the spinning electric is what makes the magnetic. Yep. So when I go back here, my red and blue dots are in the middle of that magnetic field and his are kind of on the outside. But he had the same kind of an idea. Yep.
SPEAKER 1 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
And if you want to study a little bit, there’s the link. Now, if you look at it, zoom way out and look at it of all of space, if we have a particle, green represent low pressure or low density around that particle where the epaula is expanded. The purple is representing more dense. So if you sum up in this direction all of the various layers of pressure and compare that force of those pressures to the other side, they’re the same. They’re symmetrical. Up and down, they’re symmetrical. The particle is not going to move if there’s just one particle in the distorted ether. The green is the distortion, and then there you have it. Net force is zero. The object will not move. But when you have two of them, and you bring them somewhat close together, what happens in the middle? It’s turning greener and greener in the middle. And now, when you sum these, you get a net difference. Same thing with the other particle. You get twice the green in between, and so it has a net force. And now the two can begin to come together. The equilibrium and non-motion has been re-established. So it’s just another way to do it. Now we know what gravity is. Distortion of the ether creates an offset electrical force that pushes those particles. Now, Einstein drew the expanded space, and this is one that’s on the internet. But when you look at his grid, expanded grid, and he’s not showing you the one that goes inside here, just the stuff that’s on the outside, you get this. The question is, what is the grid with Einstein? He doesn’t tell you the grid. When I ask AI, what is the space of the space time? It says it’s not physical.
SPEAKER 02 :
Right.
SPEAKER 03 :
Basically, it’s nothing. So we’re back to Isaac Newton’s warning. What is the grid? With Einstein, there is no grid. He said, well, I do accept ether. But he didn’t tell you what the ether was. Simhoni tells you the grid is the Apollo particles. That’s the intersection where those grids are intersecting. That’s where the particle is. And the particle can be expanded due to the Earth’s mass. And that then causes gravity, which then can allow the moon to use that gravity and begin circling the Earth.
SPEAKER 04 :
Yeah, so you have the gravity, which is a weak force, but this explains how you can have that happen. Interesting. Yeah. Okay.
SPEAKER 03 :
So at least Simhoni also agrees with the expanded Apollo for gravity. Einstein is saying distortion is gravity, and we got Peter Beckman saying the same thing.
SPEAKER 04 :
Mm-hmm. But Einstein throws in time.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yes. You’ve got to take time out of it and go to regular space. You didn’t need this kind of complex thought thing of time somehow and space are all together. They’re separate entities. But when you go to space, he got it right. Distortion of space creates gravity.
SPEAKER 02 :
Okay, and the addition of time that Einstein insisted that time and space are a fabric. Right. Right. OK, so that that insertion of time into that whole thought process, that was like one step too weird. That was not right there. OK.
SPEAKER 03 :
And you’re exactly right. It was one step too weird. Had he just pulled back on the time part, he’d have got it dead right. Yeah. And I do have to give him at least that distortion of space is gravity. Also, distortion of space affects the speed of light. As those particles of the Simhoni model get closer together, light goes faster because it’s stiffer. Well, where the Sun is, you see that green? That’s expanded. Now the particles are further apart from each other and they can’t vibrate because there’s less stiff. As you go away from the Sun, it gets more compact and that’s where light can travel faster. So light, according to this model, is not a constant. And if you go far out into space, you might find light traveling faster based on this model. So we have slower speed around the sun, and we have faster speed in the outer regions away from all this gravity. Guess what they found? Professor Erwin Shapiro, Harvard, he was the first to notice the unexplained time differences in the Mariner radio signals between Earth and Mars. He assumed it to be gravitationally caused time dilations, per Einstein’s theory. But what was really happening is that the speed of light wasn’t constant. That’s why the signals sometimes were getting to the Earth too fast, and sometimes they were getting to the Earth too slow. You didn’t have to go to some abstract time slowed down type thing. Let’s take a look at how that happens. When you send the signal from Earth to Mars, it goes near the Sun. As it goes by the Sun, in that region, it’s expanded. So the path, if you wait, say, six months or a quarter of a year, now they’re in this. Now when the light signal goes to Mars and back, those radio signals, notice they don’t pass near the sun. They’re further away from the sun. The further away from the sun you are, the more compact those particles are and the faster they vibrate and the faster light goes. So now let’s put it all together. Notice when the Earth is nearest the Sun, the light, it took more time. As you go the other way, the path that is further from the Sun took less time. And if it’s close to the Sun, it took more time because light was traveling slower. It took more time. This is predicted by the Simonyi-Apollo model.
SPEAKER 04 :
And this contradicts a constant speed of light.
SPEAKER 03 :
Exactly. This is evidence that the speed of light near the sun versus away from the sun are different. But if you say that, you’ll be fired. So rather than say that, that’s logical, you say, it must have been a time dilation. Oh, yeah. Wow. So now we see the time difference. It’s really attributed to the speed of light based on a real model of particles that exist.
SPEAKER 02 :
Right. And just to make it clear, the less dense ether around the sun causes those radio waves to travel more slowly. They take a little longer to get to Earth. Once we get out into space that’s not disrupted by an object, you get faster travel.
SPEAKER 03 :
It’s compact. The electron and positrons are closer together. Therefore, they’re stiffer. And if they’re stiffer, that’s part of the model of speed.
SPEAKER 02 :
Yeah, yeah, yeah. It’s very logical and very physically comprehensible.
SPEAKER 04 :
Well, I was going to say, so you had on that last slide, you had The prediction by Simhoni’s EPOLA model, which is his ether model of space. So have there been experiments direct to this?
SPEAKER 03 :
This is the first experiment that showed that this is what Simhoni would expect. If you show that there’s two paths, one away from the sun, one near the sun, Simhoni’s model said, well, the one that went near the sun ought to be slower.
SPEAKER 04 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
This is the first data that came in. And it was misinterpreted by saying, well, I can’t say light is different. I’ll be fired.
SPEAKER 04 :
That’s where they went to the time dilation. So, yeah, because we’ve always said that prediction is the currency of good science. And he makes a prediction that confirms his prediction. But instead of the secular scientists saying, hey, wow, this kind of was predicted by Simhoni. We’re seeing what he expected. But no, no, Einstein’s right. He’s a Time Magazine’s Man of the Year. The liberals love him. I’m going to lose my job, so time dilation.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s right. And besides that, E equals MC squared. Oh, yeah, E equals MC.
SPEAKER 04 :
For more on that, you’ve got to go back to the last show to find out why E equals MC squared. It has nothing to do with relativity.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay, so deep space radio signals arriving too soon? Here’s an AI overview. Pioneer spacecraft anomaly refers to the unexplained slight slowing down of the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they moved away from the sun. Wow. What was happening here? Light was getting back from those spacecraft. Once they got past Pluto, you know, that radio signal got here too quick. Why? What is wrong? Well, maybe the spacecraft slowed down and they’re not as far away as they should be. But if they’re as far away as they should be, well, then light must be going fast. Oh, we can’t say that. We’ll be fired. Yeah.
SPEAKER 04 :
And I wonder if the anomaly was too great for them to kind of explain it by the speed of that satellite, the Pioneer.
SPEAKER 03 :
Well, it took them, I think, from, let’s see, I think I have that maybe on the next slide. Okay. It took them like a decade to get far enough away to where you could finally see the speed was having an effect. So Pioneer 10 went in one direction. Pioneer 11 went in one direction. Radio signals were getting back too fast. Then they sent Pioneer 10 the other side of the sun. And guess what? All of a sudden, the radio signals were getting back too quick again. I mean, we got double trouble here. And it wasn’t just those. Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 had similar things. And Voyager 1 and 2 were built totally different. Some said, well, it might be the heat capacity of the heating elements within the spacecraft were heating one side of the spacecraft more than the other. And all of that was just saying, you know, I don’t want to get fired, so I’m not going to say it was the speed of light that was different. So they kind of brushed it to the side and said, oh, it’s probably the heating element inside the spacecraft that caused it to deaccelerate. And that’s why it wasn’t as far as we thought. But if it was as far as he thought, it’s falling simhoni perfectly.
SPEAKER 02 :
Exactly.
SPEAKER 03 :
As you get out in the deep space, the epol is more compact. It’s vibrating faster and carries light faster.
SPEAKER 04 :
And you have to make excuses to try to defend special relativity.
SPEAKER 03 :
This is his book that I believe I’ve just now showed you. It’s robust. Matter, space, radiation. Matter, space, radiation. Invitation to the natural physics of matter, space, and radiation. This is Dr. Simhoni in Israel. We held a meeting in Israel, in Jerusalem, to give him tribute. And I had the pleasure of giving him that plaque he’s holding. And scientists from the United Kingdom and the United States, about 50 of us, met and We had a dinner for him. We had PowerPoint presentations of his theory and how all of us are working hard to see and advance his theory. And he accepted the plaque. He almost had tears in his eyes at one point here. Someone finally recognized him because anybody else, if he’s working for them, they’d fire him because he went against Einstein. Yeah. And so this is the book that I believe comes closest to totally replacing the theory of relativity. Get back to a real ether with real particles, with real calculated speeds, and you’ve done it. Wow. I will mention the derivation of G was the one thing he didn’t complete. before he passed away. I’m working on that, and I wished others would take a look at it. That, I believe, is buried in his model. You put the math to that model, you should be able to derive the actual value of g from that model.
SPEAKER 04 :
So our challenge to the audience, if you’re watching this show, you made it this far, and we hope you have, because there’s been some great stuff. If you can derive… The gravitational constant using the mathematics that Dr. Simhoney started. Simhoney. Simhoney. Real Science Radio, I’m pretty sure we could get our audience. We’ve done it before. We’ll, and even crowdfund or whatever we need to do. We’ll do what? We’ll throw in 10 grand if you can come up. Well, wait a second there, Fred.
SPEAKER 03 :
I would put up part of that. I would put up part of that.
SPEAKER 01 :
Stop the tape, stop the tape. Hey, this is Dominic Enyart. We are out of time for today. If you want to hear the rest of this program, go to rsr.org. That’s Real Science Radio, rsr.org.
SPEAKER 05 :
Intelligent Design and DNA Scholars can’t explain it all away.
SPEAKER 1 :
Get ready to be awed by the handiwork of God. Tune in to Real Science Radio. Turn up the Real Science Radio. Keeping it real.
Embark on a thought-provoking journey as we dissect the complex theories of light and gravity, first proposed by Nikola Tesla and later reevaluated by contemporary scientists. Discover the compelling arguments against classical notions of relativity and learn about Dr. Simhoni’s model, which promises to redefine our understanding of the cosmos. Filled with expert commentary and historical insights, this episode challenges you to look at physics from a new perspective.
